The U.S. trade talks remain active even after a federal appeals court ruled that many of President Donald Trump’s tariffs are illegal. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer confirmed that negotiations with global partners continue, regardless of the court’s decision.
Greer explained that trading partners still move forward with agreements, showing confidence in U.S. trade talks. He noted discussions with at least one trade minister over the weekend, though he did not specify the country. This persistence underscores the administration’s determination to keep trade relationships on track.
The ruling challenges one of Trump’s key foreign policy tools. Since returning to the office, Trump has relied on tariffs to pressure rivals and push for renegotiated deals. Although these measures stirred volatility in financial markets, they remained central to his economic strategy.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently ruled 7-4 against Trump’s authority to impose certain tariffs. Judges stated Congress never gave presidents the power to directly tax or impose reciprocal duties under national emergency authority. The decision specifically covered tariffs on China, Canada, and Mexico.
Trump responded immediately, promising to appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court. He argued that tariffs remain essential to protecting American workers and reshaping global commerce. For now, the court allowed the contested tariffs to remain in place until mid-October, providing time for appeals.
Trade experts believe the administration prepared for this outcome. They suggest that backup legal options exist, including Section 338 of a 1930 law. That statute allows presidents to impose duties of up to 50% against nations discriminating against U.S. commerce.
Economists caution that other countries expecting tariff relief may face disappointment. Analysts stress that U.S. trade talks will continue under alternative strategies even if courts restrict Trump’s preferred methods. This approach reinforces the administration’s hard stance on trade policy.
White House officials express optimism about the appeal. Trade adviser Peter Navarro predicted that the Supreme Court, with its conservative majority, would ultimately support Trump’s tariff program. Trump himself promised a “big year ahead” if the court approved the measures.
Meanwhile, Republican lawmakers acknowledge that the uncertainty affects U.S. businesses. Senator James Lankford said many companies want clarity soon. For them, stability in U.S. trade talks remains crucial for planning investments and managing costs.
In conclusion, the U.S. trade talks highlight ongoing resilience despite legal challenges. While courts question Trump’s authority, the administration pursues negotiations and prepares new legal paths. The outcome of the Supreme Court appeal could shape the future direction of U.S. trade policy.
For more business updates, visit DC Brief.
