A Georgia judge dismissed the Trump case on Wednesday, ending the state-level racketeering trial tied to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. The ruling by Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee closes the last unresolved criminal case against the former president. State prosecutor Peter Skandalakis requested dismissal, citing judicial finality and public interest.
Skandalakis noted the case would have taken years to complete and would have lacked practicality with Trump in office. He argued that pursuing the case would have cost Fulton County resources without serving Georgia citizens. The dismissal comes shortly after Trump regained the White House in 2024.
Trump celebrated the ruling, posting on Truth Social that “LAW and JUSTICE have prevailed.” His lead attorney, Steve Sadow, called the case a form of “lawfare” and said it should never have been brought. The indictment originally included 13 criminal counts, including Georgia’s anti-racketeering law violations.
The charges alleged that Trump and co-defendants, including Rudy Giuliani and Mark Meadows, illegally tried to reverse Joe Biden’s victory in Georgia. Their actions involved pressuring Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to change vote totals. At least four co-defendants pleaded guilty, while Trump remained a central figure.
The case faced complications after allegations against Fulton County DA Fani Willis emerged, leading to her disqualification. McAfee previously dismissed two counts but retained key charges. Skandalakis took over the case in November 2025 and quickly moved to drop it.
In his motion, Skandalakis stressed that contesting an election is not unlawful. However, he noted the strategy in Washington had escalated, contributing to the Capitol attack. He suggested that any federal-level investigations could address the broader efforts.
The Trump case highlighted challenges in prosecuting a sitting president, including legal immunity and logistical difficulties. Experts said the ruling underscores the limitations of state-level prosecutions against national political figures. The case also prompted discussion about election law, accountability, and prosecutorial discretion.
With the Georgia dismissal, Trump now avoids potential state penalties and can focus on national political ambitions. Observers expect federal authorities may continue reviewing related election interference matters. The resolution also provides closure for Fulton County and signals a shift in focus for future political and legal scrutiny.
The Trump case in Georgia will remain a key reference point for discussions on election integrity, presidential accountability, and state versus federal authority.
For more updates, visit DC Brief.
