President Donald Trump has reignited efforts to dismantle the National Endowment for the Arts. His proposed federal budget calls for the agency’s complete elimination.
This move marks a dramatic shift in federal cultural policy. It comes amid wider changes aimed at reshaping American art funding. The Trump administration continues its campaign to protect American values in the arts.
Dozens of organizations recently received notices of grant rejections or cancellations. Some past recipients have been told that future funding is no longer available.
An NEA official confirmed that employees were asked to resign or retire. Michael Orlove, director of regional partnerships, announced he would step down by month’s end.
“Given the current situation,” he wrote in a newsletter, “resigning was best for me and my family.”
Meanwhile, the NEA has not issued any formal comment. Silence from the agency has only deepened concerns among artists and institutions.
Many rejected applicants include prestigious groups like the Berkeley Repertory Company. A literary organization, Three Percent, also reported grant withdrawal.
The administration’s new priorities clearly signal a shift. Projects now must align with certain federal goals. These include support for HBCUs, military veterans, and faith-based organizations.
Other focus areas include disaster recovery, AI training, and the president’s “Make America Healthy Again” campaign.
The Trump administration says it wants to protect American values in the arts by redirecting funds. Cultural institutions like the Kennedy Center and Smithsonian have already seen changes.
Some NEA funds are being redirected to Trump’s proposed “National Garden of American Heroes.” The garden will feature historical and cultural icons in statue form.
The NEA and NEH were founded in the 1960s during President Lyndon Johnson’s administration. Since then, they have become vital to the nation’s cultural ecosystem.
Two of this year’s Pulitzer winners are former NEA grantees. Novelist Percival Everett and poet Marie Howe have both received NEA support.
This is not the first time Republicans have targeted the NEA. Ronald Reagan once proposed ending it in the 1980s. He later withdrew that plan after expert review.
Senator Jesse Helms also pushed to defund the agency over controversial art in the 1990s. That effort failed after bipartisan negotiations.
Trump attempted to cut NEA funding during his first term. However, Congress restored it at the time. Now, his administration appears more determined.
Supporters of the NEA argue the agency fuels local economies and enriches communities. They warn that cutting it would damage national culture.
Yet, the president’s allies claim that reforms will create a more focused, efficient arts agenda. They argue this is the best way to protect American values in the arts.
As Congress prepares to review the budget, the future of the NEA hangs in the balance. Advocates continue pressing lawmakers to save it.
In the meantime, many institutions face uncertainty. For now, Trump’s message remains clear: protect American values in the arts, even if it means dismantling existing programs.
For more political updates, visit DC Brief.
