President Donald Trump said he could authorize tomahawk missiles for Ukraine if Russia refuses to stop its invasion. His comments marked a potential turning point in U.S. policy toward the conflict and raised global attention.
Speaking with reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump warned that Moscow must end the war or face new consequences. He said he might instruct the U.S. military to send “incredible tomahawk missiles” to Kyiv. Trump emphasized that he prefers peace but will not let “Russia continue unchecked.”
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy confirmed he discussed the issue with Trump in a recent call. He expressed optimism, noting that the United States continues to support Ukraine’s defense and recovery. Zelenskyy highlighted the urgent need for stronger long-range capabilities and thanked Washington for maintaining close communication.
Meanwhile, Russia responded sharply. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said Moscow views any delivery of tomahawk missiles as a “serious escalation.” Russian President Vladimir Putin warned that deploying such weapons would cross a dangerous line and provoke “severe consequences.”
The tomahawk missiles have a range of over 2,500 kilometers and can hit deep targets with precision. Defense analysts say these weapons could give Ukraine the ability to reach critical Russian military facilities. However, others warn that such moves could provoke retaliation and expand the war beyond Ukraine’s borders.
Inside Washington, reactions were divided. Supporters of a stronger Ukraine policy praised Trump’s stance as a deterrent against Russian aggression. Critics, however, accused him of raising global risks and questioned whether the move would actually end the war.
Economists and defense experts also assessed the potential market effects. Increased military aid could boost U.S. defense manufacturers, particularly those producing advanced missile systems. At the same time, geopolitical uncertainty may pressure global energy and commodity prices.
Diplomatic observers say Trump’s warning could be both a negotiating tactic and a real policy shift. They note that Trump often uses public pressure to influence adversaries. Yet, they caution that missteps could undermine ongoing diplomatic efforts with NATO allies and neutral states.
Looking ahead, much depends on Russia’s response and whether negotiations resume. If the threat pushes Moscow toward compromise, the move may reduce conflict. If not, the world could see heightened confrontation and broader economic fallout.
Ultimately, Trump’s latest statement underscores how fragile peace remains in Eastern Europe. The possibility of deploying tomahawk missiles reminds all sides that the costs of escalation continue to rise.
For more political updates, visit DC Brief.
